Burnsville woman takes felony DWI and drug charges to trial

A Burnsville woman reportedly is taking her Minnesota felony DWI case before a jury in April. Anyone facing DWI charges, whether the accused is facing a first-time misdemeanor offense or the person is charged with a higher level of DWI, has the right to take the state’s case before a jury. The right to a jury trial is but one of many vital constitutional rights that defendants have to protect all of our rights under our system of justice.

The current Dakota County case against the Burnsville woman includes allegations that the woman was driving while impaired. Reports suggest that the woman refused to submit to a blood or urine test on the night of her arrest, which was Dec. 24, 2010.

Police claim that the woman had run through a stop sign, swerved and then stopped in the intersection before continuing forward. A police officer pulled the woman over, apparently for rolling too far into the controlled intersection before stopping.

The officer claims that he could smell marijuana in the car. He also says that he found two prescription bottles, with the labels scratched off, containing oxycodone in the center console. The woman reportedly told the officer she had a prescription for the medication. The woman was arrested and refused to submit to the chemical test.

As this blog has previously discussed, test refusal under Minnesota’s DWI and implied consent laws is itself considered a crime. However, the woman is facing a felony level offense based upon allegations that she has a prior felony DWI conviction on her record, dating from 2005 based upon allegations arising in Inver Grove Heights. As this blog has explained, a Minnesota law allows prosecutors to seek felony DWI charges against a person who has a prior felony DWI conviction on his or her record.

The current felony charges against the woman also include fifth-degree controlled substance crime allegations for alleged unlawful drug possession.

Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press, “Burnsville woman convicted in 2005 fatalities is again accused of DWI,” Maricella Miranda, Mar. 14, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.