Conference discusses changes to sex crimes penalties

Recently, a conference was held at William Mitchell College of Law that discussed potential changes to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program. Commissioner Lucinda Jesson of the Department of Human Services, the agency responsible for carrying out the program, as well as legislators from both parties attended. The state is currently facing serious issues in the treatment of sex offenders.

When someone is convicted of a serious sex crime in Minnesota, the offender may be held at one of two treatment facilities within the state after he or she has completed a prison term. There is no end date on the length of the confinement, and to date, no one who has been placed into the MSOP has ever been released.

While many present agreed that there are serious problems with the program that need to be addressed, there still is uncertainty on how best to move forward. Those who are critical of the current MSOP feel that it violates people’s civil rights due to the potentially never-ending confinement.

Officials from other states were on hand to discuss potential release options, which include the use of GPS tracking devices, frequent monitoring by law enforcement post-release, as well as the use of judges to determine if an offender can be removed from the program. Releasing offenders would help save costs and eliminate any constitutional concerns that might arise.

However, not everyone is in favor of releasing offenders from the program. One proposal at the conference would increase prison sentences substantially for those who have been convicted of more serious sex crimes.

Changes to the MSOP will be coming, but no one knows how or when. As various options are discussed and considered, it will be important to stay informed to understand the potential impact on those who are facing possible inclusion into the program.

Source: Star Tribune, “Minnesota’s sex offenders — dealing with the worst in a better way,” D.J. Tice, Jan. 23, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.