Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Court: DWI vehicle forfeiture not subject to Minnesota exempt property law

A man was stopped in Minneapolis in April 2011 and ultimately charged with first-degree driving while impaired, a felony level offense in Minnesota. He reportedly pled guilty to the felony DWI in the criminal case. But as this blog has reported, a DWI case in Minnesota may also be accompanied by other legal action in civil court, if a defendant timely challenges the implied consent license revocation, or files a court challenge to an administrative vehicle forfeiture that can follow specified DWI arrests.

The civil suits have short timelines to perfect the civil court challenge. A Minnesota DWI lawyer may be able to explain the different procedures if a person acts quickly enough after a DWI arrest to contact legal counsel. The man arrested in Minneapolis in 2011 promptly filed a challenge in conciliation court in an effort to keep his car from the administrative forfeiture.

County attorneys later took the case to district court, which upheld the forfeiture, essentially allowing the state to take the car after he pled guilty to the qualifying felony DWI charge in the criminal case. The man appealed that ruling to the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

The appellate court ruled Monday that the District Court judge properly found against the man, despite a 2008 Minnesota Supreme Court ruling barring the forfeiture of a home in a Minnesota drug crime case. That ruling held that the Minnesota Constitution and state exemption statutes barred the state from forfeiting the defendant’s home as a drug-asset homestead forfeiture associated with the alleged drug crime.

Monday the three judge appellate panel ruled that the 2008 high court ruling does not apply to cars forfeited in associated with DWI charges. The court reasoned that Minnesota law places a “special and long-settled heightened protection of homesteads.” The court refused to extend that level of protection to vehicles associated with a repeat DWI vehicle forfeiture action.

The ruling does not preclude other challenges to a vehicle forfeiture, nor does it deny a defendant a defense in the criminal DWI case. A Minnesota DWI defense lawyer can help a person accused of DWI to understand what legal challenges and defenses may be available in an individual situation.

Sources:

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.