Court: Party hosts not to blame for underage drinking and crash

It’s not easy for any parent or loved one to lose a family member or friend. It is natural to look for someone to blame in such instances, and sometimes that blame is just. If someone owed a responsibility to someone and their negligence leads to death, then the courts will often hold negligent parties accountable, criminally, civilly or both.

We usually don’t cover out-of-state cases on this blog, but a recent ruling in an Illinois underage drinking case is worth covering. In a civil case against a couple who hosted a 2006 party, the court found that the party hosts aren’t legally accountable for a fatal DWI crash caused by one of their underage party guests.

According to news reports, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendants today. The court based its decision on its belief that the party hosts didn’t claim any responsibility over their party guests. Also, they reportedly did not provide the alcohol to underage guests.

The court ruled differently than another court in the criminal case against the parties.

In this underage DWI incident, the man who drank and then drove was 18 years old. In other words, he was too young to legally drink. While that is true, the court highlighted the fact that even though the crash victim was underage, he was still legally an adult, making him more responsible for his actions.

The court apparently saw it as a stretch to blame the defendants for a mistake that another adult chose to make. What do you think about this case or issue in general? Do you think that the couple in this case owed a duty to their 18-year-old party guest?

Source

Daily Herald: “Lake Co. couple not liable in underage drunk driving death,” Jeff Engelhardt, 19 May 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.