What Is Considered Cruel & Unusual Punishment?

Acts that deliberately degrade or inflict pain or injury on prisoners and punishments that are disproportionate to the crime are considered cruel and unusual punishments under the Eighth Amendment.

Table of Contents

What Is Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

Under the Eighth Amendment, anyone convicted of a crime is guaranteed due process. This includes prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment defined as punishment that’s deliberately degrading, a punishment that’s too severe for the crime committed, and acts of violence or torture.

In 1910, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged uncertainty about “what constitutes cruel and unusual punishments” under the law. The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment related to the following conditions.

Prison Conditions

The Eighth Amendment cruel and unusual punishment clause addresses a prisoner’s conditions of incarceration, stating that prison officials may not deprive inmates of “the basic necessities of life,” including shelter, food, clothing, sanitation, and necessary medical attention. The Supreme Court made the following rulings:

  • Overcrowding – The Supreme Court ruled that prison overcrowding is unconstitutional because it endangers a prisoner’s basic living conditions, health, and safety.
  • Beatings – The Supreme Court ruled that “unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain” such as malicious acts by prison guards used to punish prisoners are considered cruel and unusual punishments.

Proportionality of Sentence

The Supreme Court ruled that the sentence for a crime must not be disproportionate to the crime committed, regardless if it’s a felony or misdemeanor. Certain factors are considered to measure proportionality, such as the severity of the offense, the harshness of the penalty, sentences imposed on other offenders within the same jurisdiction, and sentences imposed on other offenders in different jurisdictions.

Under the Eighth Amendment, no particular term of years in prison is prohibited and the death penalty is not considered cruel and unusual punishment. If arrested in Minnesota, a criminal defense attorney in Minneapolis can work to reduce a harsh sentence that involves time in prison.

Prisoner’s Age

The Supreme Court considers the age of an offender when determining the constitutionality of imprisonment. There are special considerations for sentencing juvenile offenders. The court ruled that it is unconstitutional to impose a life prison sentence on juvenile non-homicide offenders and juvenile homicide offenders without the possibility of parole.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.