Sex, Drugs, and Criminal Charges

Unreliable date rape drug testing and a lack of solid evidence can make it difficult to prove drug-facilitated sexual assaults occurred.

Dangerous Date Rape Drugs

Date rape drugs have sedative properties that cause victims to experience unconsciousness and amnesia. Most drugs are odorless, tasteless, and colorless and dissolve easily in alcohol and other beverages within 30 minutes. Commonly used date rape drugs include over-the-counter drugs like tranquilizers and sleeping pills and various prescription medications including Rohypnol (roofies), Ketamine (special K), Gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), and Gamma-Butyrolactone (GBL). Drugs are available in pills, liquids, and powders that are easily accessible to perpetrators through illegal street drugs.

Accusers of date rape may have a difficult time proving that sexual assault occurred unless there’s strong physical evidence. There are often no witnesses to the alleged crime, and accusers can have little or no memory of what happened. Some date rape drugs leave the body very quickly, so waiting to report an incident or get medical attention can destroy evidence that a crime has been committed.

Date Rape Testing Flaws

Toxicology testing that confirms exposure to drugs or alcohol is an important factor in claiming sexual assault. In a recent investigation by BuzzFeed News, significant irregularities were shown in date rape testing procedures in state crime labs and hospitals across the country. There is no national testing standard for the range of drugs to be tested, which types of screens should be used, or drug levels that result in positive findings. In the United States, there are currently over 100 known substances now used in date rape assaults, and toxicologists are having difficulty keeping up with sufficient testing procedures.

Research in date rape drug testing shows that many labs only test blood, but evidence of drugs last much longer in urine. In some labs, testing equipment is not sensitive enough to detect even low levels of drugs, so lab results commonly reveal negative results. Other labs rely entirely on drug screening procedures proven to be completely unreliable by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

A positive urine test showing evidence of drugs is not always sufficient to support sexual assault charges. A positive urine test only proves that the person was likely exposed to the drug within five days prior to the drug test. It does not show how the accuser came to be exposed to the substance.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.