What You Should Know About Drug Induced Homicide

Drug-induced homicide laws are putting drug dealers, as well as friends and family who share drugs behind bars.

Table of Contents

Drug-Induced Homicide Laws

When a person sells or shares drugs with another person who dies from an overdose, the person who supplied the drugs can be charged drug-induced homicide. With the steep rise in drug addiction and overdose deaths in recent years, many states have adopted drug-induced homicide laws to help fight the war on drugs. According to the New York Times, 36 states have prosecuted drug-induced homicides. Between 2015 and 2017, records show that drug-induced homicide cases doubled across the country and quadrupled in Minnesota. Criminal charges in these cases ranged from involuntary manslaughter to second-degree murder.

The opioid epidemic in America has created a public health crisis. In 2016, opioid overdose deaths killed one percent of the U.S. population, more than all deaths from the Vietnam War. Opioid overdose is responsible for 20 percent of deaths in American young people between ages 25-34. To address these problems, many states have created a Drug Task Force to enforce drug-induced homicide laws when overdose victims die from shared drugs. In New York, a woman was convicted of drug-induced homicide and sentenced to six years in prison for mailing a friend drugs who died of an overdose. In Florida, a man injected his girlfriend with what he thought was heroin. It turned out to be Fentanyl and the girl died of an overdose. The man was charged with second-degree murder.

Although drug-induced homicide laws were enacted to deter drug sales and drug use, research shows that they do not deter either. Many health experts argue that drug addiction is a mental health issue that is not a part of a person’s free will. This raises questions and concerns about induced-homicide charges imposed on people who are addicts themselves and share drugs with other addicts. Should these people be held liable for overdose deaths? In many cases, drug addicts often discover other addicts or friends who have overdosed. Would calling for help put them at risk for criminal offense charges?

Drug-induced homicide laws are controversial. Some states argue that these laws deter drug dealers, while others argue that they simply put more addicts in jail where their addiction becomes worse. Health experts argue that the money spent on prosecution, conviction, and housing a person in jail would be better spent on drug treatment and recovery.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.