What Drug Sentencing Reforms Mean for Minnesotans

The Minnesota House recently passed a compromise bill amending the state’s drug sentencing guidelines. The new guidelines are intended to divert many offenders to treatment programs instead of to prison cells. The changes come after it was recognized that 7 times out of 10, judges applied less severe punishments than guidelines called for. Indeed, many judges remain steadfast in their belief that many offenders should be rehabilitated rather than incarcerated.

One of the most significant changes to the law is that it expands the scope of drug offenders who are eligible for enrollment within early release programs. Under the new guidelines, offenders who complete drug treatment programs and maintain a peaceful demeanor while in prison will be eligible for early release.

The legislation also reduces the recommended sentence for the first-degree sale or possession of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine to just over 5 years. Under current law, the recommended sentence is 7 years. The threshold for a first-degree offense of these narcotics has also been raised from 10 grams to 17 grams.

The new law makes it possible for those convicted of second-degree narcotics sale to avoid prison time by instead diverting these individuals into 4-year probation programs. However, the law enhances penalties when aggravating factors are present regardless of first or second degree offenses. These aggravating factors include being arrested while in the possession of a firearm, dealing narcotics across state lines, or dealing drugs for the benefit of a gang.

While the state is getting softer on hard drugs, they are getting harder on soft drugs. The state has lowered the threshold for first-degree charges related to the sale or possession of marijuana. Under current law, this threshold is 50 kilograms for those arrested for sale, and 100 kilograms for those merely in possession of marijuana. Under the new guidelines, these limits have been reduced to 25 kilograms for sale, and 50 kilograms for possession.

The legislation is expected to sail through the Senate before being sent to Governor Dayton who is has already said he would sign the bill into law. The changes are not retroactive, however, they will be applied to pending cases. Ultimately, it is the belief of legislators, judges, and drug attorneys in St. Paul that the new guidelines will serve to ease overcrowding in the state’s prisons. They will also make it possible to divert more funds towards prevention, treatment, and probation programs in the future.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.