Early tally in December Minnesota DWI enforcement reaches 823 arrests

This blog recently discussed that law enforcement is increasing its patrols throughout December, seeking to find drunk drivers. The statewide driving while impaired enforcement effort involves nearly 400 Minnesota law enforcement agencies. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety is reportedly helping to coordinate the increased DWI patrols.

Officials say that preliminary reports from roughly 191 Minnesota agencies show that 823 drivers were charged with DWI between Dec. 1 and Dec. 11. Each DWI charge in Minnesota can also have an impact on a person’s driving privilege in the state.

Minnesota’s implied consent law allows the state to revoke a person’s driver’s license after a DWI arrest. The license revocation can be challenged, but the challenge is actually a separate matter from the criminal DWI case.

Many drivers in Minnesota delay bringing a challenge to the implied consent license revocation until after the deadline for perfecting the challenge passes and lose the ability to raise a challenge to the revocation. It is important to speak with an experienced Twin Cities DUI defense and implied consent attorney as soon as possible after a DWI arrest for an assessment and advice about how to proceed in an individual case.

While the preliminary numbers for the December DWI enforcement program include reports from less than half of the agencies participating in the effort, the numbers of DWI arrests are significant. In Minnesota each year, officials say that as many as 30,000 people are charged with a DWI offense. Authorities estimate that one in seven Minnesota drivers has a DWI on his or her driving record.

As this blog has discussed, a DWI conviction can enhance a subsequent DWI charge for ten years. It is important to note that an implied consent license revocation can also be used for ten years to enhance any potential subsequent DWI charge under Minnesota law.

Source: Northfield News, “State DWI campaign: More than 800 arrested in Minnesota,” Dec. 19, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.