Exemplary life lightens sentence for convicted bank president

It may be true that the purest of plans often go awry, as it seems to have been the case for a Minnesota bank president whose efforts to save a failing bank has led to a conviction for white-collar crimes. Ultimately, however, a federal district court judge gave the man a light sentence, noting he has led an “exemplary life” and is known for community service and philanthropy. He will not have to pay any fines nor make restitution.

Hired as the bank’s president after the bank had been open just three years, he brought along a banking customer who wrote checks between various business accounts at two banks, leaving a trail of back checks totaling $1.9 million. The bank president sought to use bank funds to cover the expected overdrafts from the bad checks. His plan involved the help of five straw borrowers, taking out a total of $1.9 million in loans. For this, he was sentenced to 3 1/2 years in prison, far less than the 10-year sentence sought by prosecutors.

While prosecutors argued that the banker put the bank at risk, his own attorney described his motive as “pretty pure,” saying that it was his intention to save the bank. He argued that his actions were perhaps a “temporary lapse of judgment” at worst. During the trial, the man’s family and friends filled the courtroom in a show of support.

The businessman responsible for writing the bad checks was sentenced the day before. He too received a 3 1/2-year sentence. A third defendant was acquitted months before.

The small bank has since been closed by state regulators, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation selling it to another bank.

While the bank president’s life of public service and failed attempts at saving the bank protected him from an overly harsh punishment, this is relatively rare for people accused of white-collar crimes. It is very possible that he could have been sentenced to much more time in prison or forced to pay an exorbitant fine.

Source: Star Tribune, “Ex-Pinehurst Bank chief gets prison for scam role,” Jennifer Bjorhus, Sept. 22, 2012

Find out more about what our practice has done on behalf of Minnesotans charged with white-collar crimes by visiting our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

What Happens If You Get a DWI While Riding a Scooter or E-Bike in Minneapolis?

Minnesota DWI laws apply to all types of motorized vehicles using the road. So, you may get arrested and charged with DWI while riding a scooter or E-bike if your blood alcohol concentration is 0.08 or more. The penalties for a DWI conviction may range from driver license suspension or revocation and fines to imprisonment. A conviction may also result in collateral consequences, including job loss and higher auto insurance premiums. A DWI lawyer can minimize the legal consequences or avoid them altogether. So, be sure to retain a lawyer immediately after you get arrested or charged for riding a scooter or e-bike while impaired.

Can a Criminal Record Impact New Charges in Minnesota?

People with prior convictions and facing new charges may wonder, “Can a criminal record impact new charges in Minnesota?” Having a criminal record can influence how the prosecution and court will handle your current charges. The court may deny your bail request or impose strict conditions. It may also impose harsh penalties. The prosecution, on the other hand, may be reluctant to give you a favorable plea deal if you have a prior conviction for a similar or related offense.