Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Exemplary life lightens sentence for convicted bank president

It may be true that the purest of plans often go awry, as it seems to have been the case for a Minnesota bank president whose efforts to save a failing bank has led to a conviction for white-collar crimes. Ultimately, however, a federal district court judge gave the man a light sentence, noting he has led an “exemplary life” and is known for community service and philanthropy. He will not have to pay any fines nor make restitution.

Hired as the bank’s president after the bank had been open just three years, he brought along a banking customer who wrote checks between various business accounts at two banks, leaving a trail of back checks totaling $1.9 million. The bank president sought to use bank funds to cover the expected overdrafts from the bad checks. His plan involved the help of five straw borrowers, taking out a total of $1.9 million in loans. For this, he was sentenced to 3 1/2 years in prison, far less than the 10-year sentence sought by prosecutors.

While prosecutors argued that the banker put the bank at risk, his own attorney described his motive as “pretty pure,” saying that it was his intention to save the bank. He argued that his actions were perhaps a “temporary lapse of judgment” at worst. During the trial, the man’s family and friends filled the courtroom in a show of support.

The businessman responsible for writing the bad checks was sentenced the day before. He too received a 3 1/2-year sentence. A third defendant was acquitted months before.

The small bank has since been closed by state regulators, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation selling it to another bank.

While the bank president’s life of public service and failed attempts at saving the bank protected him from an overly harsh punishment, this is relatively rare for people accused of white-collar crimes. It is very possible that he could have been sentenced to much more time in prison or forced to pay an exorbitant fine.

Source: Star Tribune, “Ex-Pinehurst Bank chief gets prison for scam role,” Jennifer Bjorhus, Sept. 22, 2012

Find out more about what our practice has done on behalf of Minnesotans charged with white-collar crimes by visiting our website.

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.