Federal investigators believe 120 people involved in fraud ring

The U.S. Attorney’s office has recently been busy processing numerous white-collar criminal charges against what they claim is a large identity theft ring. While no one from the office will comment on the charges or the supposed 120 people involved in the identity fraud, only eight people have been formally charged.

Several of the people facing white collar criminal charges for identity theft, money laundering and bank fraud have pled guilty, according to the Star Tribune. Although this could indicate that they are admitting their guilt, other sources indicate that many of the suspects who have pled guilty have also agreed to help federal investigators, indicating they may receive a reduced sentence for their assistance.

The first of the suspects to have pled guilty was a 31-year-old woman from St. Paul. She pled guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering in September after prosecutors said she used falsified identification and counterfeit checks to purchase items and then return them for cash.

Federal investigators have been looking into the supposed criminal ring and believe that there could be 120 people involved. They have also said the alleged money laundering and other activities may now be in at least 12 states.

A few of the people who have been charged in this supposed criminal enterprise have chosen to plead guilty in exchange for helping federal investigators. While this is certainly a difficult decision to make, it should only be done after considerable consultation with a criminal defense attorney. Blindly entering a plea deal because you believe you will get a reduced sentence can be extremely dangerous without an attorney by your side, explaining your options and protecting your Constitutional rights.

Source: Star Tribune, “Big Twin Cities ID theft ring unmasked,” Dan Browning, Jan .9, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.