Former police lieutenant convicted of theft and forgery charges

A former Minneapolis police lieutenant was convicted in December on one charge of theft by swindle and four charges of forgery stemming from an incident that happened three years ago. She will be sentenced Feb. 5.

The Hennepin County attorney reportedly said in a release that, although the amount of money was not large, “no one is above the law.”

It is clear that Hennepin County is committed to holding law enforcement officers accountable for their actions, just as everyone else should be held accountable. But is this officer being held to the same standards as everyone else, or being treated more harshly because of her position in law enforcement?

The amount of money in question is $1,500, which the officer returned a short time after a coworker said she had withdrawn the money from the 2010 International Association of Women’s Police Conference’s checking account — an account which she had control over. When she came back from vacation, her supervisor asked her about the suspected withdrawal and the officer redeposited the money.

Charges against the officer originally were filed in 2010, but a judge dismissed the case against her, reportedly because, under employment law, the conversations the officer’s supervisor had with her violated her rights. The county attorney’s office successfully appealed that decision, and charges were refiled.

The county attorney admitted the amount in question is small, and it was returned.

If the charges were against a citizen, someone not connected with law enforcement, would the attorney have taken the same steps to appeal and refile charges against a regular citizen, all for $1,500?

Source: Star Tribune, “Former Mpls. police officer convicted of theft and forgery,” Nicole Norfleet, Dec. 18, 2012

Learn more about theft crimes in Minneapolis by visiting our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.