George Zimmerman interview may prove bad for defense

Everyone in Minneapolis can agree that if you are charged with murder, you should probably avoid things that are bad for your defense. Any kind of violent crime will automatically come with considerable media attention, whether that is just in Minneapolis, across the state or across the country. The more public the case, however, the more difficult it may be to successfully defend against the criminal charges.

Minnesotans are familiar with the George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin case. Though Zimmerman has said that he was justified in shooting Martin in February, many media sources and individuals have speculated about whether this is actually true, affecting common people’s understanding of the case. With the serious charge of murder hanging over his head, it would be reasonable that Zimmerman would only do what is best for his case.

Surprisingly, however, Zimmerman was recently interviewed on national television, something that has tremendous opportunity to backfire. Some criminal defense lawyers have said that giving an interview could potentially lead to a slip of the tongue, which could then be admitted into evidence against Zimmerman. Even if what Zimmerman says conforms to his defense, it is possible that his interview could be misinterpreted or taken out of context by the jury.

Though suspected violent crimes in Minnesota have not reached the level of infamy as the Martin case, many suspects and their criminal defense attorneys know that giving an interview may not be the best idea. It is impossible to control what a journalist asks and no one wants to be put into a situation in which he or she says something that could possibly strengthen an indictment.

For Zimmerman, however, it will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Source: Christian Science Monitor, “George Zimmerman’s Fox News interview: Risky step for Trayvon Martin’s killer,” Mark Guarino, July 19, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.