Getting Charged with DWI When You’re Not Driving

While people might think that they must be driving in order to get charged with a DWI, the law allows people to be charged with the offense even when they are not actually driving their vehicles. It is possible for a person to get charged with a DWI when his or her car is stopped and not running in certain cases. A Minneapolis DWI lawyer sometimes has cases in which his or her client was not driving at the time of the offense but had actual physical control of the car.

Actual Physical Control in Minnesota

According to the law in Minnesota, people may be charged with DWIs if they are operating, driving, or have physical control of the vehicle while they are under the influence of alcohol or drugs that affect their ability to drive and their nervous systems. Prior to 2010, the lower courts in Minnesota had treated physical control under the statute as meaning situations when there was evidence that the car had recently been driven. In 2010, the Minnesota Supreme Court weighed in, changing how courts define physical control of a vehicle.

State v. Fleck and physical control

State v. Fleck dealt with a case in which a man who was sleeping in his driver’s seat with the car door ajar prompted a concerned neighbor to call 911 and to ask that officers check on the man to make certain that he was okay. The lights of the car were not on and the engine was not warm. While the police didn’t think the car had been on, the man’s car keys were inside of the vehicle’s console. After he was convicted of DWI, the man appealed. The Minnesota Court of Appeals overturned the man’s conviction.

The Minnesota Supreme Court reinstated the conviction. It ruled that if there is evidence that a person can start his or her vehicle and drive it, it is enough for that person to be convicted of DWI. The key factors that juries consider when determining whether or not a person had control of the vehicle include where a person’s keys are located and where the person is sitting. A Minneapolis DWI lawyer may analyze whether his or her client had actual physical control of a vehicle at the time of the DWI charge.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.