Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Hastings man pleads guilty to DWI involving bath salts

In the last post, this blog discussed a recent discussion among Minnesota officials who are urging more clarity in Minnesota’s controlled substance crime laws and DWI laws in relation to so-called “bath salts.” The synthetic substances were added to Minnesota statutes last year and on July 1, prosecutors were first able to charge Minnesotans with DWI related to bath salts. Just three days after the new DWI law went into effect, a Hastings man was arrested on suspicion of DWI in relation to bath salts.

The St. Paul Pioneer Press reports that the 47-year-old pled guilty to one count of felony DWI in relation to that offense. It is important to note that the felony level charge was not a function of the substance underlying the allegations, but rather due to enhancements to the DWI charges under the regular DWI and implied consent statutes in Minnesota.

Law enforcement claims the man had previous DUI and DWI convictions on his record on the day of last summer’s arrest. Generally, a person can be charged with a felony level DWI offense based upon three or more prior DWI convictions or DWI related loss of license events within the preceding ten years of a current offense. A single prior felony-level DWI conviction may also be used to enhance a current DWI offense to a felony.

Reports indicate that a blood test showed the presence of an illegal substance that authorities had described as a synthetic substance, commonly referred to as bath salts, which reportedly mimic cocaine, methamphetamine or Ecstasy. The Hastings man apparently entered a plea agreement last week related to the July 3, 2011 allegations.

Sources indicate that the man pled guilty in Dakota County District Court last week to one count of felony DWI and the prosecutor reportedly has agreed to drop three other felony counts and one petty misdemeanor in the case. The Hastings man is scheduled to appear April 6 for sentencing, and reportedly could face up to 3-and-one-half years in prison under the deal.

Source: Pioneer Press, “Hastings: Man with 10 DWIs drove under the influence of ‘bath salts’,” Maricella Miranda, Mar. 5, 2012.

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.