Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

How high should bond be set for drunk driving?

When someone in Minneapolis is arrested for felony drunk driving, he or she will still likely be able to leave and remain at home until his or her trial. Only if the suspect refuses to or is unable to afford bond would he be stuck in a jail cell until he or she is able to appear in court. With a potentially long wait, it is likely that most people will pay the bond if they can.

But, what if a judge set a prohibitively high bond? What if bond was set so high that it was next to impossible to afford? These situations happen all too often, and the suspects sitting in prison with $1 million bonds are likely going to remain there until their trials. When many people in the Twin Cities think of what kind of people these may be, they likely don’t think of drunk drivers, especially not people accused of drunk driving that did not injure someone in a crash.

Unfortunately, one man who has been arrested on suspicion of a seventh drunk driving incident will stay in jail on a $1 million bond. It is true that he has had several drunk driving arrests and convictions and it is true that when he was arrested he was only caught after he smashed into a fence, but he never injured anyone during the entire alleged incident. So why has the judge decided to keep him stuck in jail?

The whole purpose of the bond is to prevent someone from leaving the jurisdiction between his or her arrest and trial. The bond is set to be just enough of a burden to keep the suspect around, but not so high that he or she would be unable to afford it. And, if someone is particularly violent or they have no ties to the jurisdiction, the judge may choose to not set bond at all, meaning there is no option for the suspect to live out of jail before trial. Setting the bond higher than any normal person would be able to afford is more an affront than an actual opportunity to secure a suspect’s freedom.

Source: Twin Falls Times-News, “Twin Falls Man Gets $1M Bond on 7th DUI Charge, Eluding Deputies,” Alison Gene Smith, March 27, 2013

If you would like to know more about how our law firm handles felony criminal defense, please visit our website.

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.