How high should bond be set for drunk driving?

When someone in Minneapolis is arrested for felony drunk driving, he or she will still likely be able to leave and remain at home until his or her trial. Only if the suspect refuses to or is unable to afford bond would he be stuck in a jail cell until he or she is able to appear in court. With a potentially long wait, it is likely that most people will pay the bond if they can.

But, what if a judge set a prohibitively high bond? What if bond was set so high that it was next to impossible to afford? These situations happen all too often, and the suspects sitting in prison with $1 million bonds are likely going to remain there until their trials. When many people in the Twin Cities think of what kind of people these may be, they likely don’t think of drunk drivers, especially not people accused of drunk driving that did not injure someone in a crash.

Unfortunately, one man who has been arrested on suspicion of a seventh drunk driving incident will stay in jail on a $1 million bond. It is true that he has had several drunk driving arrests and convictions and it is true that when he was arrested he was only caught after he smashed into a fence, but he never injured anyone during the entire alleged incident. So why has the judge decided to keep him stuck in jail?

The whole purpose of the bond is to prevent someone from leaving the jurisdiction between his or her arrest and trial. The bond is set to be just enough of a burden to keep the suspect around, but not so high that he or she would be unable to afford it. And, if someone is particularly violent or they have no ties to the jurisdiction, the judge may choose to not set bond at all, meaning there is no option for the suspect to live out of jail before trial. Setting the bond higher than any normal person would be able to afford is more an affront than an actual opportunity to secure a suspect’s freedom.

Source: Twin Falls Times-News, “Twin Falls Man Gets $1M Bond on 7th DUI Charge, Eluding Deputies,” Alison Gene Smith, March 27, 2013

If you would like to know more about how our law firm handles felony criminal defense, please visit our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

What Is the Exclusionary Rule in a Criminal Case?

So, what is the exclusionary rule, and how does it apply to your case? The exclusionary rule is a court-driven rule that takes effect when evidence in a criminal case is unlawfully obtained. In your case, a court might use the exclusionary rule if the illegally obtained evidence helped the officers get other pieces of evidence they would not have found otherwise.  The secondary evidence subject to the exclusionary rule is referred to as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The exclusionary rule borrows its reasoning from constitutional rights. So, it applies to criminal cases as a deterrent and remedy rather than a standalone constitutional right.

What Happens If You Violate Probation in Minnesota?

People who suspect that they have violated probation or are already facing a violation charge might ask, “What happens if you violate probation?” A probation violation in Minneapolis, Minnesota could result in a range of consequences, depending on the type and severity of the violation. Those consequences include reprimand from probation officers, enhanced supervision and stricter conditions, and probation revocation and incarceration.