Indiana Court Rules Illegal Arrests Cannot Be Resisted Even At Home

An Indiana appeals court has ruled that, when faced with an illegal arrest, citizens have no right to resist arrest in their homes by the police. The court over-ruled English-American common-law precedent dating back to 1215, the date of the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta was the first basis charter of human rights and civil liberties in English constitutional history. It formed the basis for the Bill of Rights of our U.S. Constitution, including the principle that police may not violate your rights and affect an Illegal Arrest if they do not have a Search Warrant or certainly narrow exceptions to the Warrant Requirement.

Under the Indiana decision issued earlier this week, the Indiana court said it is contrary to public policy to encourage citizens to fight with or resist the police, even if the citizen’s rights are being ignored or violated. The appellate court held that citizens have an adequate remedy for violations of Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure law even without fighting with police to resist an illegal entry into their homes. Instead, they could sue the police under federal civil rights law or get evidence thrown out under the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule states that courts must suppress or throughout any evidence that is gained illegally or by violating a citizen’s rights.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can Past Allegations of Sex Crimes Be Used Against You in Minnesota?

One question people charged with a sex crime in Minneapolis, MN, ask is: Can past allegations of sex crimes be used against me? Under Minnesota Rules of Evidence, past sex crime allegations aren't admissible as evidence in court to prove a suspect's character and argue that it contributed to the commission of the current crime. However, there are circumstances in which the court may allow prior allegations or bad conduct as evidence. These circumstances include when the prosecution can demonstrate that prior allegations or acts are key to establishing intent, identity, or pattern of bad conduct related to the current crime.

What If The Alleged Victim Was Drunk? Minnesota Consent & Alcohol Laws

Under Minnesota consent & alcohol laws, it is unlawful to engage in sexual contact or intercourse with someone drunk or intoxicated to a degree that prevents that person from consenting, understanding, or keeping his or her actions in check. Simply put, you should avoid sexual contact with a person who visibly looks impaired by alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances.

How Long Do Police Have to File Drug Charges in Minnesota?

People facing arrests or under investigation for drug-related crimes often wonder: How long do police have to file drug charges in Minnesota? Once police officers conclude their investigations and arrest you for drug trafficking, the law bars them from holding you in custody for long. But, even if they can't keep you in jail, the Minnesota statute of limitations allows the prosecution to file the charges within three (3) years of arrest.