Judge sentences Hastings man to 5 years for felony drugged driving

A judge has sentenced a Hastings man to five years in state prison on a felony conviction for driving while impaired. Last summer, Minnesota state law addressed so-called “bath salts” in the state’s DWI statutes.

The Hastings man reportedly told law enforcement after a traffic stop near Rosemount that he was under the influence of bath salts and the man was subsequently arrested for felony DWI. News reports now indicate that the man actually tested positive for the presence of cocaine and methamphetamine. Controlled substances have long been covered under Minnesota’s implied consent and DWI statutes.

The nature of the alleged substance, however, is not the basis for the felony charges filed against the Hastings man. DWI offenses in Minnesota can be elevated to the felony level for a number of reasons, including alleged prior DWI convictions.

Minnesota DWI laws look back ten years for prior DWI convictions or other qualified impaired driving incidents, which include prior DWI license revocations. Those prior incidents can be used to enhance a current charge to a felony. Generally, three prior DWI convictions in the past ten years is sufficient for authorities to seek a felony DWI charge, as this blog has previously discussed.

It is important to note that a prior felony DWI conviction is not subject to the general ten-year look back period, and can be used alone to enhance a current allege offense to a felony.

Dakota County prosecutors say the Hastings man had a prior felony DWI conviction from 2005, for which the media says the man was incarcerated for a year. News reports also say that the man had a total of ten prior DWI convictions, but the media generally does not indicate the timing of those prior convictions.

The Hastings man reportedly pled guilty to the felony DWI charge and recently faced sentencing in Dakota County. Prosecutors asked the judge to impose a five-year prison sentence for the conviction and the judge reportedly agreed.

Source: My Fox Twin Cities, “Man Sentenced to 5 Years for 11th DWI,” April 8, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.