Kids should know prom fun doesn’t depend on underage drinking

“Everyone is doing it!” That’s a common reply that parents and teachers might hear from teenagers who are trying to defend less-than-ideal behavior. And at this time of year, that statement is probably being used more than ever.

Yes, prom season is upon us. And while we adults all have our own memories of the landmark event in our lives, it’s important to focus on the reality of our kids’ day in age. The theory that prom and DWIs go hand-in-hand, however, seems to have been debunked by recent studies. So, maybe that means parents have less to worry about.

According to U.S. News & World Report, fewer teens actually drink and drive on their prom nights than people generally think. Only a reported 6 percent of students admit to drunk driving. On one hand, that is definitely good news. That means that less kids will be cited for underage drinking and less drunk driving accidents will occur.

Interestingly, while only 6 percent actually drive drunk, sources report that 90 percent of teens think that their friends would drive drunk at prom. Misperception regarding the reality of underage drinking and drunk driving can endanger more teens. We have all heard of peer pressure. It can certainly be a powerful motivator for kids to participate in behavior that they otherwise would avoid, including drunk driving.

Because peer pressure can significantly affect teens’ actions, that means that teens actually have a lot of power to protect their peers. If more kids speak out against underage drinking and driving under the influence, more teens will understand that not everyone is doing it. Lives will be saved. Plus, kids and their parents will be saved from legal troubles.

Of course, parents are the ones who can inspire courage within their kids to speak out and mitigate negative peer pressure. The chairman of Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD) encourages parents to have open, casual and honest conversations about alcohol use and drunk driving. The trick, he claims, is not to preach to your kids; simply make the topic a consistent point of discussion for your family.

Source : U.S. News & World Report: “Drunk Driving After Prom: Perception vs. Reality,” Jason Koebler, 21 Apr. 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.