List reveals southeast Minnesota priests accused of sex crimes

Victims of sexual abuse in the church have been trying to get lists of accused priests published for years. Recently, the Diocese of Winona came forward with a list naming 14 priests that may have been involved in the sexual abuse of minors. The list was submitted to a district court in Ramsey County just one day prior to a judge’s established deadline. The formation of the list was part of a judicial order that required Minneapolis and St. Paul churches to release a similar list earlier in the month. That list named 34 priests.

According to one attorney that represents victims of sex crimes, these lists help keep children safe. Also, he argues that the lists may help victims to seek confidential help rather than suffering in silence. One advocate for abuse victims, a former priest, stated that the list is a good start but is by no means comprehensive. He believes that the number of priests involved in sexual abuse may be much larger. He also states that the lists should reveal when church leaders found out about the abuse and what was done to cover up the incidents.

Some of the priests on the list are now deceased. One of the five clergy that is sill alive was removed from his position. Three more priests on the list will be removed soon. One bishop from the diocese has apologized for the alleged crimes and has expressed his hope that the church and community can move forward. Advocates for the victims state that bishops must have the courage to contact police when these allegations arise, otherwise no progress will take place.

Even though the crimes that are alleged in this situation are particularly despicable and involve a severe breach of trust, it must be remembered that these are just accusations. The priests are innocent until proven guilty in the courts, regardless of the public outrage surrounding them.

Source: kare11.com, “Winona Diocese priest list released” No author given, Dec. 16, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.