Mankato football coach cleared of child pornography charges

Earlier this fall we covered the story of the Minnesota State Mankato football coach who was charged with child pornography after an information technology employee found videos on his work cellphone. The videos allegedly showed his three children naked and playing and led to very serious criminal charges. Today, a Blue Earth County judge dismissed all charges against him.

As we mentioned earlier, it may not have been the best idea to record family videos on his cellphone, but that does not mean that a lapse of judgment should lead to a criminal conviction. There needs to be an actual violation of the law for someone to be convicted. And, in this case, the judge said that these videos did not violate any child pornography laws.

Previously, the prosecutors had said that the videos clearly were sexually exploitative and that they were a “lewd exhibition of the genitals.” He also claimed that the videos showed one of the children masturbating. After the judge reviewed the videos, however, she said that the videos were merely children being children. If there had been any touching of the genitals, it was coincidental and not sexual.

The coach is very lucky that he had an impartial judge reviewing the videos. Child pornography charges often raise extreme emotions, and it makes it difficult for anyone, jury members and judges alike, to be unbiased. This is why it is extremely important for anyone suspected of sex crimes to work closely with a criminal defense attorney.

Source: Star Tribune, “Judge dismisses child porn charges against Mankato football coach,” Richard Meryhew, Nov. 30, 2012

If you want to read more about how this man was acquitted, please see the source above. If you want to learn more about our work with people who have been accused of child pornography possession, please visit our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.