Meth Drug Trade Not Stopped by Cold Medicine Electronic Sales System

Over the last few years customers of local pharmacies have had to obtain cold medicine by taking a slip of paper stocked in the medicine aisle to a pharmacist where the over-the-counter drug would be tracked via an electronic tracking system. The purpose of the electronic system was to monitor the buyer’s legal limit of pseudoephedrine, a cold medicine used to make methamphetamine, and to reduce the number of drug crimes associated with the creation of meth.

According to new federal information, the electronic monitoring system and legal limit of pseudoephedrine have not been as successful as hoped and has created a new black economy. Instead of curbing the flow of cold medicine used to create meth, the electronic system has created a boom in demand for pseudoephedrine and has pushed the black market price of the drug significantly north. A box of pseudoephedrine pills can be purchased at a pharmacy for $7 or $8 and sold on the black market for $40 or $50.

The legal limit and electronic tracking system which was created to impede the obtainment of cold medicine apparently has backfired as individuals, who are not tempted by meth, purchase the cold medicine in order to make a quick buck. “Where else can you make 750 percent profit in 45 minutes?” asks a police detective from Missouri. Since tracking laws were created in 2006, the number of drug crimes involving meth is back on the climb.

Supporters of the tracking laws say the laws make it easier for police to identify people involved in the production of meth. The law’s detractors say it has created more criminals because more people are involved in the meth production process. Before the law when meth producers could purchase as many pills as they wanted, the production process often involved only one person. Now, meth producers enlist the help of any interested party.

Source: The Associated Press, “AP Impact: Meth Flourishes Despite Tracking Laws,” 1/10/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can Past Allegations of Sex Crimes Be Used Against You in Minnesota?

One question people charged with a sex crime in Minneapolis, MN, ask is: Can past allegations of sex crimes be used against me? Under Minnesota Rules of Evidence, past sex crime allegations aren't admissible as evidence in court to prove a suspect's character and argue that it contributed to the commission of the current crime. However, there are circumstances in which the court may allow prior allegations or bad conduct as evidence. These circumstances include when the prosecution can demonstrate that prior allegations or acts are key to establishing intent, identity, or pattern of bad conduct related to the current crime.