Methamphetamine charges prey on cash-strapped senior citizens

If you think the only people being charged with methamphetamine charges are people living in rural Minnesota, you would be wrong. The face of meth use is growing to include all kinds of people and many people who are being charged in Minnesota and across the country on meth charges are not even using the drug, they are only somewhat related to the manufacture and sale of meth.

A growing phenomenon is called “smurfing.” Smurfing is a way to get past the laws that restrict how much pseudoephedrine an individual can buy, the main component of meth. In many states, pseudoephedrine is heavily monitored and stores in all states must store products with pseudoephedrine behind the sales counter after the 2005 Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act was passed. The Act also required stores to keep track of who purchased how much pseudoephedrine products.

So, one way to get past these laws is to use someone else to purchase the pseudoephedrine products for the manufacturer. A manufacturer may use several smurfers to collect pseudoephedrine products in order to get a sufficient amount to make his or her meth. The problem is, however, that smurfers may find themselves in trouble with the law.

A 60-year-old woman had been approached by meth producers to help them get their hands on pseudoephedrine. The woman, who was desperate for cash, started selling $10 blister packs for $50 to cooks in her area. Soon, however, she attracted the attention of state authorities because she had purchased a suspiciously high number of products with pseudoephedrine, which was enough to arrest and charge her with the promotion of manufacturing methamphetamine.

This story reminds us that it is not just meth users who are at risk of arrest and incarceration, but also those who have been exploited by manufacturers to help in the production of this drug.

Source: ABC 5, “Meth mom: I literally went from June Cleaver to this person was nuts,” Don Wade, Nov. 15, 2012

Discover more about methamphetamine crimes by visiting our Minneapolis drug charges page.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.