Minneapolis Expands Diversion Programs in Lieu of Prison

Diversion is an alternative sentencing program that permits qualified candidates to enter the program and, assuming the candidates complete the program, avoid serious criminal convictions and prison. Diversion programs were first started under the Great Society social programs in the Johnson Administration.

These programs were largely dismantled under the Reagan Administration. However, by the mid-1990’s several states were resurrecting alternative sentencing and punishment structures to tackle the underlying causes of crime.

The Problem

Many misdemeanor and minor drug offenses do not result in jail time. But they do saddle people with hundreds of dollars in fines and penalties. Unfortunately, many of these people are unable to pay these costs which quickly balloon into thousands. Eventually, they are rearrested for falling behind on their payments. These people are pulled into the penal system, they lose their jobs, their homes, and the government is forced to pay for them while they are incarcerated. The net effect is a loss for both parties, the government, and the offenders.

Diversion Program

Diversion programs were enacted as an alternative path for certain, eligible, defendants. It started as a program that emphasized treatment, counseling, and assistance over incarceration for certain drug offenders (primarily low-level users, people charged with distribution were ineligible for the program) and is now rapidly expanding.

Expansion of Program

Minneapolis is expanding the number of defendants who are eligible for the program. Diversion program is now used as an alternative sentencing system for a variety of misdemeanors including:

  • Uninsured driving;
  • Public urination; and
  • Shoplifting.

The objective was to avoid saddling these people with unsustainable debt loads that, almost, inevitably resulted in reincarceration. The City Attorney justified the expansion by explaining that enforcement levels will remain the same but the expansion of the program will ensure that people are not penalized for being poor.

To facilitate the expansion, the city established a team to review misdemeanor charges which will assist police in determining when to bring charges. It will also review cases for eligibility into the diversion program. Most low-level offenders are eligible for the diversion program unless they committed a violent or serious crime.

Benefits

Diversion programs, arguably, address the underlying causes of crime without perpetuating it. An experimental diversion program for interfering with police charges was launched last year. Suspects who qualify meet with the officer one-on-one to discuss the events that lead to the arrest. After the meet, the charge is wiped from their record.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.