Minneapolis’s high rape statistics are misleading

Many people in Minneapolis are likely aware that the number of rapes reported within the city are much higher than any other city in the country. What they may not know, however, is that the Minneapolis Police Department has been reporting far more crimes than just rapes to the FBI. For at least the past eight years, the Minneapolis Police Department has been operating under a much broader definition of rape than what has been requested by the FBI for its statistical comparisons.

This has led, unsurprisingly, to Minneapolis being ranked first in the nation for the number of forcible rapes in the country for the past five years. Not only does this draw unfair and misplaced criticism, but it also means the police department has received more money to combat rape than it would have if it had accurately reported. Since 2009, the city has been awarded $6.5 million in federal grants.

According to the officer in charge of the Minneapolis Police Department’s sex crimes unit, she was more concerned with reporting all acts of sexual violence than just what the FBI was interested in. Now that the misreporting has been made public, however, her department will be updating the numbers with the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

Over the past five years, there has been considerable effort to crack down on rape and sexual violence, but that eagerness may have led to sloppy policing. If police and prosecutors are pressured to convict people of sexual assault in an effort to show that Minneapolis is improving, they may be willing to violate defendants’ rights or use otherwise suspicious methods of investigation. Now that it is clear that Minneapolis has been overreporting the number of rapes, there may be less of an incentive to prosecute as many individuals.

Source: Star Tribune, “Minneapolis police overreporting rape statistics,” Brandon Stahl and Alejandra Matos, March 11, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.