Minneapolis’s high rape statistics are misleading

Many people in Minneapolis are likely aware that the number of rapes reported within the city are much higher than any other city in the country. What they may not know, however, is that the Minneapolis Police Department has been reporting far more crimes than just rapes to the FBI. For at least the past eight years, the Minneapolis Police Department has been operating under a much broader definition of rape than what has been requested by the FBI for its statistical comparisons.

This has led, unsurprisingly, to Minneapolis being ranked first in the nation for the number of forcible rapes in the country for the past five years. Not only does this draw unfair and misplaced criticism, but it also means the police department has received more money to combat rape than it would have if it had accurately reported. Since 2009, the city has been awarded $6.5 million in federal grants.

According to the officer in charge of the Minneapolis Police Department’s sex crimes unit, she was more concerned with reporting all acts of sexual violence than just what the FBI was interested in. Now that the misreporting has been made public, however, her department will be updating the numbers with the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

Over the past five years, there has been considerable effort to crack down on rape and sexual violence, but that eagerness may have led to sloppy policing. If police and prosecutors are pressured to convict people of sexual assault in an effort to show that Minneapolis is improving, they may be willing to violate defendants’ rights or use otherwise suspicious methods of investigation. Now that it is clear that Minneapolis has been overreporting the number of rapes, there may be less of an incentive to prosecute as many individuals.

Source: Star Tribune, “Minneapolis police overreporting rape statistics,” Brandon Stahl and Alejandra Matos, March 11, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.