Minnesota Court of Appeals: People can’t use medical marijuana laws from another state

In 2011, a 31-year-old man was pulled over for speeding in Itasca County, Minnesota. During a search of the vehicle, law enforcement found two jars of raw marijuana under the hood of his car. As a result, the man was charged with fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance. According to the Associated Press, the man argued that he had a medical prescription for the narcotic from California. The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that it didn’t matter and upheld the conviction.

As medical marijuana continues to be a hot-button issue across the country, more instances of people taking prescriptions across state lines may occur. Twenty-three states and Washington, D.C., have legalized marijuana for medical purposes, with two of those condoning recreational use as well. Minnesota only permits marijuana possession in certain forms of medically prescribed use.

The debate at hand

When the man was arrested three years ago, Minnesota did not have any laws on the books granting citizens medical use of marijuana. However, California did. The appeals court did not permit the man to admit his prescription as evidence. Therefore, he argued that he was denied the right to present a defense and that he was not afforded equal protection under the law.

This past May, the appeals court ruled that Minnesota still classifies the drug as a Schedule 1 substance, which is why people found in possession are often charged with drug offenses. Further, the panel of three judges found that the state did not have to accept another state’s ruling.

On the books

It is important for people to understand the medical marijuana law in Minnesota as well as its limitations. For example, those with a prescription for the drug may only use it in one of the following forms:

  • Pill
  • Oil
  • Vapor

Additionally, physicians may only prescribe marijuana to people who have been diagnosed with a select few medical conditions such as Crohn’s disease, cancer or seizures. Due to the restrictions, researchers have found that nearly 33,000 people will not receive the medication they need because they cannot smoke the marijuana leaf. Additionally, there are only two dispensaries statewide.

Minnesota state law makes it a felony to transfer a medical marijuana prescription to someone else. Outside of those penalties, consequences of non-medicinal possession range from a $200 fine and mandatory drug education for a first offense to extended prison sentences. Anyone with questions regarding how the state’s legal system handles marijuana laws should consult with a defense attorney.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.