Minnesota driver with 20 DWIs still not convicted of felony

A recent Minnesota criminal case opens up an opportunity for us to discuss drunk driving laws throughout Hennepin County and the rest of the state. Specifically, we’d like to explain what it takes to turn a DWI charge into felony status.

To many, it seems like a given that one Minnesota man would have been charged and convicted of felony DWI after being arrested for a 20th drunk driving incident. But he wasn’t. In the end, he only pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor charge. Why?

Minnesota law classifies the following as felony DWI cases:

  • Someone gets a new DWI after having already been convicted of at least three other DWI charges within the past 10 years;
  • Someone gets a new DWI after previously having been convicted felony of Criminal Vehicular Operation (CVO), that is causing an accident and serious injury to another person as a result of driving drunk or driving while impaired by drugs, either street drugs or prescription drugs;
  • Someone gets a new DWI after previously having been convicted of a felony DWI, even if that felony DWI was more than 10 years ago.

In the case of the 57-year-old St. Paul Park man who now has 20 DWIs on his record, the majority of those convictions occurred more than a decade ago. Only two of the cases have taken place in the relevant time period, securing him a lesser gross misdemeanor DWI conviction.

Someone who is convicted of felony drunk driving in Minnesota would serve as much as seven years in prison. For pleading guilty to the gross misdemeanor charge in this case, the defendant was sentenced to a year in jail, more than 300 days of which he has already served. That’s quite a difference compared to seven years.

Some critics who have followed this Minnesota case believe the case proves how the state should reevaluate its DWI laws. Whether such an evaluation is seriously being considered has not been disclosed.

Source

Star Tribune: “Driver gets year in jail after 20th DWI arrest,” Jim Anderson, 5 May 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.