Minnesota father accused of DWI; Daughters say dad had girls open beers

A Northwestern Minnesota man was arrested last week in Dilworth, Minnesota on suspicion of felony drunk driving. Followers of this blog are aware that Minnesota’s implied consent and driving while impaired statutes include aggravating factors that can bump a drunk driving charge from a misdemeanor up to a higher level offense.

A single aggravating factor, for instance, may increase a first-time DWI offense to a gross misdemeanor charge. Repeat DWI offenders, drivers with high alcohol measurements (0.20 percent blood alcohol concentration or greater), and drivers accused of driving drunk with a child in the car may face enhanced DWI charges.

Like with any DWI allegations, drivers accused of an enhanced DWI charge (including those based upon out-of-state prior drunk driving convictions) should consider speaking with a DWI defense lawyer as soon as possible after an arrest.

In addition to enhanced criminal consequences, a driver may face increased civil penalties attacking the driver’s privilege to drive, and in some enhanced cases, the government may take the vehicle in a forfeiture action. The timeline to challenge an implied consent loss of license or vehicle forfeiture is short and may lapse before an appearance is scheduled in criminal court.

The man arrested in Dilworth, Minnesota last Friday reportedly has three prior DWI convictions on his record within 10 years. Two of the prior convictions are from North Dakota. However, the man is also accused of the current drunk driving charge with his twin 12-year-old daughters riding in the car. Police claim that the driver tested 0.24 percent in an evidentiary breath test at the Clay County Law Enforcement Center after his arrest.

Clay County authorities have charged the 47-year-old Moorhead, Minnesota man with two counts of felony DWI, and two counts of gross misdemeanor child endangerment charges. Police claim that the man’s daughters told law enforcement that their father had been driving at 90- to 100-miles per hour. The girls reportedly claim that the driver had his daughters opening beers for him as he drove the car.

The man was booked into jail. Authorities say that he was released after posting $12,000 bond. A court appearance is scheduled for March 15 on the criminal charges.

Source: The Jamestown Sun, “Man charged with felony drunken driving: Twin daughters tell deputy in DWI arrest father had them open beers as he hit 100 mph,” Emily Welker, March 6, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.