Minnesota, federal courts haven’t addressed new police technique

Can police use your cellphone and cellphone towers to determine your location? If so, do police officers need to get a warrant based on probable cause before they do? These are the questions that one lawsuit hoped to solve for the whole country, but the Supreme Court of the United States has declined to hear the case. Since Minnesota courts and the federal court responsible for Minnesota have not yet heard the issue either, it remains to be seen whether this is permissible under criminal law.

It is not entirely clear why the Supreme Court has rejected the case, considering that last year they took up a case that decided whether police needed a probable-cause warrant before seruptitiously attaching a GPS device to a car to track a defendant’s location. Since the court ruled that police officers do need a warrant, it would not be unreasonable for the court to rule that police need a warrant for using cell towers to locate defendants, as well.

As of yet, however, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, the court responsible for Minnesota, has not yet issued a ruling on this, which means that there is little preventing Minneapolis police officers from tracking defendants using their cellphones.

As this issue becomes more contentious and there are more court decisions defining what is and what is not acceptable, it is possible that there will be more interest by the Supreme Court in taking up the case. For now, however, it seems Minneapolis and St. Paul police officers are able to ask cellphone providers to hand over location data for an investigation.

Source: Wired, “Courts Can’t Agree on Whether Cops Can Track Your Cell Without a Warrant,” David Kravets, July 3, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.