When Minnesota field tests identify other substances as illegal drugs

In November, a Minnesota man was pulled over for leaving a grocery store parking lot without turning on his headlights. According to Raw Story, police ended up searching his vehicle and found a bag of white powder. Law enforcement conducted a field test, which revealed that the substance may have been an amphetamine. As a drug crime lawyer in Minneapolis may have seen, findings such as these can lead to felony drug charges.

This man, who claimed he had done nothing wrong, was charged with two felony counts of drug possession and was detained in jail for three months. However, in-depth testing revealed that the white powder was actually legally available vitamins, and not drugs. The man was released, but he will never get back those three months of his life.

Testing gone wrong

Unfortunately, field drug tests can often produce unreliable results. For example, the Star Tribune reported in 2011 that a Minnesota woman crossing into Canada was arrested when an old bottle of motor oil tested positive for heroin. After spending 12 days in jail, the woman was finally let go because a Canadian laboratory determined the bottle only contained old motor oil.

A recent report from Fox News details how unreliable field drug tests can be. One reason for a false positive, according to a toxicologist, is that the tests simply change color instead of actually identifying substances. Another report from StoptheDrugWar.org reveals the following:

  • Newspaper, chocolate and natural soap can test positive for marijuana.
  • Oregano can test positive for cocaine.
  • Poppy seeds can appear as opiates.

Ibuprofen, cold medicine, diet pills, sleep aids and a host of other items can trigger a positive field test. StoptheDrugWar.org notes that in one study, researchers found that 70 percent of field tests done in a controlled environment generated false positives.

Defending a false positive

Any drug crime lawyer in Minneapolis is aware that the use of faulty drug testing violates U.S. Supreme Court rulings that aim to protect citizens from experiencing wrongful prosecutions and conviction.

False positives are not restricted to field tests, as they can occur in urine and blood testing as well. People wishing to defend drug charges are wise to do so. Testing positive for drugs can prevent someone from obtaining employment and result in hefty fines and even time in prison.

Until law enforcement discontinue the use of such unreliable testing, many more people may be subjected to wrongful arrests and convictions that can haunt them for the rest of their lives. Anyone with questions on this matter should consult with a drug crime lawyer in Minneapolis.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.