Minnesota judges continue to rule against implied consent law

We have discussed the issue of warrants in drunk driving investigations—an issue that was highlighted recently when the United States Supreme Court ruled that in a routine DWI investigation law enforcement acted improperly in seeking a blood sample without a warrant. The high court ruled the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated.

Prosecutors across the country began arguing in the wake of the McNeely decision finding the warrantless blood draw that the case only included blood tests. But judges in Minnesota have been giving some mixed rulings in other types of DWI investigations.

The St. Cloud Times recently reported that four Stearns County judges have found Minnesota’s implied Consent law is unconstitutional. Two others reportedly have disagreed in specific cases, according to the Times. An Anoka County judge ruled that an implied breath test after a traffic stop for a malfunctioning tail light was unconstitutional because it was conducted without a warrant.

Followers of this blog may not be surprised to hear that a growing number of Minnesota judges are applying U.S. Supreme Court precedent to Minnesota’s implied consent laws. Last month we discussed the issue as judges in Minnesota and Arizona began addressing the issue anew after the nation’s highest court issued its ruling. But, with a smattering of rulings coming out with a different result, the issue may be headed for a criminal appellate ruling.

A person accused of a crime has the right to defend against the charges in court. Many Minnesotans understand the concept, but it is important to note that a person convicted of a crime, including DWI, continue to have rights in court. A person can appeal the conviction, but timing is important.

Anyone who feels that the trial court process resulted in a wrongful DWI conviction can consult with legal counsel knowledgeable in criminal appeals to learn what appellate defenses may be available in a specific set of circumstances.

Source: The St. Cloud Times, “DWI case could mean changes for law enforcement,” Davis Unze, June 29, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

What Happens If You Get a DWI While Riding a Scooter or E-Bike in Minneapolis?

Minnesota DWI laws apply to all types of motorized vehicles using the road. So, you may get arrested and charged with DWI while riding a scooter or E-bike if your blood alcohol concentration is 0.08 or more. The penalties for a DWI conviction may range from driver license suspension or revocation and fines to imprisonment. A conviction may also result in collateral consequences, including job loss and higher auto insurance premiums. A DWI lawyer can minimize the legal consequences or avoid them altogether. So, be sure to retain a lawyer immediately after you get arrested or charged for riding a scooter or e-bike while impaired.

Can a Criminal Record Impact New Charges in Minnesota?

People with prior convictions and facing new charges may wonder, “Can a criminal record impact new charges in Minnesota?” Having a criminal record can influence how the prosecution and court will handle your current charges. The court may deny your bail request or impose strict conditions. It may also impose harsh penalties. The prosecution, on the other hand, may be reluctant to give you a favorable plea deal if you have a prior conviction for a similar or related offense.