Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Minnesota Senate considers employment expansion for ignition interlocks

A state senator from Northern Minnesota introduced a new measure to the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday that seeks to create a pilot program to extend the use of ignition interlock devices in Minnesota driving while impaired cases.

Ignition interlocks are devices that are installed in a car to prevent the vehicle from starting when a driver measures above a specified level for alcohol in a breath test (generally set at 0.02 percent blood alcohol concentration). The device may also include random resting while the car is running-that information is stored in the unit.

The devices have been in use in Minnesota for some time now in certain DWI cases. A pilot program was deemed successful and was expanded to statewide use in 2011. The current law allows drivers to continue to drive after being accused of DWI in Minnesota by having the device installed at the defendant’s expense.

The devices have been important for people in Minnesota, especially for those who need to drive to get to work. That is similar to where the Northern Minnesota lawmaker seeks to expand the use of ignition interlocks–in work-related areas.

The bill seeks to allow use of ignition interlock breath testing machines in work-related vehicles with the employer’s permission. A report carried in the Daily Tribune does not indicate where the proponents of the bill wish to begin the pilot program.

But the measure would allow workers to drive company vehicles with an ignition interlock if the employer signs onto the program. An amendment to the bill reportedly addresses the issue of “whiskey plates,” allowing a driver to operate the employer vehicle without requiring whiskey plates to be installed on the employer vehicle.

A state senator from St. Louis Park added an amendment to the bill to extend the program to drivers convicted of criminal vehicular homicide or criminal vehicular operation. The bill was introduced (and amended) in the committee this week before the Senate Judiciary Committee sent the approved measure to the Senate Transportation and Public Safety Committee.

Source: Hibbing Daily Tribune, “Ignition interlock program introduced,” Urmila Ramakrishnan, March 13, 2013

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.