An Overview of Minnesota’s Adult Drug Offender Evaluation Program

Minnesota utilizes specialized courts to hear cases involving drug crimes. Every few years, the state conducts an audit of the entire program to measure its effectiveness. The results of that audit are discussed here.

Overview of the Drug Court

The Drug Court rose to prominence in the mid-2000s. By 2007, it had 27 operational drug courts covering one-third of Minnesota counties. The Drug Court specializes in trying and convicting drug offenders. Its judges understand the nature of drug crimes and the role that addiction plays. The goal is to create an alternative punishment method to reduce recidivism and keep drug offenders out of prison.

The Audit

The audit compared the Drug Court with a “comparison court” to measure its effectiveness.

Recidivism is the rate at which people re-offend after being convicted. If there is a high recidivism rate, then there are more repeat criminals. The Drug Court has a recidivism rate of 26 percent after two and one-half years versus 41 percent for traditional courts. After two-and-a-half years, it is widely believed that most people avoid criminal behavior altogether. This statistically significant result indicates that the Drug Court’s methods are effective at keeping people out of prison.

Drug Court Success Rates

The Drug Court is a give-and-take program. Individuals must apply into the program, be accepted and then complete the rehabilitation process. Individuals move through the program in a series of steps. Each program is tailored to fit an individual’s history and needs, usually a combination of therapy, classes, and tests.

The Drug Court is rigorous. The median graduation rate was only 54 percent. The Drug Court could improve the graduation rate, however, there is also the argument that the Drug Court is a privilege – not a right – people must earn the right to be in the program. Without that dedication, it is possible the rehabilitative aspects of the Drug Court may be unsuccessful.

Cost to Society

The objective of these programs is to reduce the cost to society. Unfortunately, the budget was cut therefore a cost-benefit analysis was not possible. However, the evaluators did measure the literal savings through reduced prison sentences, recidivism, and time in jails.

The evaluators found that, over two and one-half years, the average cost of a Drug Court participant was $3,189 less than traditional inmates. Overall, the costs of a Drug Court participant are significantly lower than holding people in prisons or jails.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.