Do You Understand Your Miranda Rights? [infographic]

According to psychologists and other experts, people often waive their Miranda Rights because they don’t fully understand them or they don’t believe they have anything to hide. Understanding the Miranda Rights can help preserve important protections against self-incrimination.

(Article continues below infographic)

______

Table of Contents

What are Miranda Rights?

Miranda rights are meant to protect a person from coercive interrogation techniques often used by law enforcement. When suspects are questioned by police officers, some can be easily coerced into admitting to a crime by sharing too much information or discussing details of the event. Juveniles, nervous suspects, and people who think they can talk their way out of the situation are especially vulnerable to waiving Miranda Rights and losing their protection against self-incrimination, false accusations, search without consent, and perjury. The Fifth Amendment states that no person can be compelled “to be a witness against himself.”

Miranda Rights state the following: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.”

Although many people have heard these words, experts report that some don’t fully understand what they mean. To exercise Miranda Rights, a person must say they want to remain silent. Any time police question a person who’s in police custody, that person has a right to invoke his/her Miranda Rights. As soon as that happens, the police interrogation must come to a halt.

All crime suspects are protected by their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and their Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. However, in certain cases involving serious offenses and violent crimes, a suspect can be questioned without being Mirandized if the suspect is considered to be an imminent threat to public safety.

Criminal suspects can waive their right to remain silent or to have an attorney present either expressly or implicitly. To expressly waive Miranda Rights the suspect would state, or sign something stating, that he/she waives the right to remain silent or the right to have an attorney present. An implied waiver means that the suspect behaves in a way that indicates a knowing and voluntary waiver of his/her rights. However, before Miranda Rights can be waived, a suspect must first be informed of those rights and fully understand them as explained.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.