How Nanny Cams Can Impact Your Criminal Case

Video from a nanny cam may provide important evidence in a criminal case, as long as the footage remains within the rules of criminal trial evidence.

Table of Contents

Nanny Cam Evidence

Nanny cams may provide surveillance evidence in the event of a crime, as long as state and local laws are not violated. In all states, using video surveillance in a home is completely legal, as long as it does not include sound. Audio recordings are a different matter. In some states, video recordings with sound violate wire-tapping laws. However, the sound on a video can easily be muted so most video footage is allowed as evidence in criminal court cases unless the incriminating portion of the video is the speech itself.

If a person suspects problems within his/her home, a nanny cam can be installed to check activity in the house or on the property. Nanny cams are often installed to watch children in the home, especially when a parent suspects child abuse or neglect from a childcare provider like a nanny or babysitter. If the video exposes dangerous or inappropriate behavior or injuries to the child, the childcare provider may be charged and prosecuted for a crime. The person using the camera will need to provide the video or a copy to local law enforcement for investigations. It may become another piece of evidence to help convict the individual, as long as the footage remains within the rules of criminal trial evidence.

If a nanny cam records a person committing a crime such as child abuse, physical or sexual assault, burglary, theft, or property damage, the homeowner may have the option to seek justice through the criminal justice system. However, the footage must clearly show the criminal action. In some cases, the nanny cam may capture the perpetrator on camera, but may not show the actual crime committed. This may not be sufficient evidence to convict someone of a crime. In some cases, this may even lead to a false arrest and criminal charges.

Privacy laws can hinder the use of video evidence. Some laws forbid surveillance equipment in private areas like bedrooms, bathrooms, and dressing areas. Although nanny cams do raise privacy concerns, most states allow video footage in criminal investigations. While many states have laws that regulate the taping of someone in areas where they have expectations of privacy, those privacy laws do not extend to individuals committing a crime.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.