Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Could New Technology Free the Innocent in Minnesota Criminal Cases?

New DNA technology is helping to exonerate many prisoners who were wrongfully convicted for crimes they did not commit.

Justice for Wrongfully Convicted Prisoners

Cutting edge DNA technology is responsible for the freedom of many innocent people wrongfully incarcerated in criminal cases. A sophisticated computer program developed by Cybergenetics, a California company, is being used to exonerate prisoners around the world. The program, called TrueAllele, was created by a technician with a medical degree and a PhD in computer science. It uses algorithms to analyze and breakdown small amounts of remaining DNA evidence from crime scenes.

In 2006, TrueAllele DNA technology was first used in a murder investigation which found incriminating evidence under the victim’s fingernails. The FBI lab estimated a 1 in 13,000 chance that the evidence did belong to their prime suspect in the murder case. Since then, the technology has been used in criminal court cases in 14 states to clear wrongfully convicted prisoners, some who served more than 20 years in prison. To date, new DNA technology has freed 367 wrongfully convicted prisoners, of which 41 served time for crimes they did not commit and 21 were on death row awaiting execution.

In a recent highly publicized case, a man was exonerated and freed from prison after serving a 36-year sentence behind bars. In 1982, Archie Williams was convicted of sexual assault and rape and first-degree murder when he was just 22 years old. Although crime scene fingerprints did not match, witnesses did not identify him in two different line ups, and people testified he was at home asleep at the time of the crime, Archie Williams was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.

The Innocence Project

With help from The Innocence Project and criminal defense lawyers, wrongfully convicted prisoners have renewed hope of release. The Innocence Project began fighting for Archie Williams in 1995, more than two decades before he was finally released at age 58. New TrueAllele DNA technology provided a method of forensic testing that proved Mr. William’s innocence and released him from prison. 

When the Innocence Project took Archie William’s case, Louisiana did not allow DNA testing for convicted prisoners. Legal issues with state laws, DNA technology, and fingerprint testing prevented his release. The Innocence Project played a major role in implementing new DNA technology and Next Generation Identification, a new type of fingerprint testing system that helped to release hundreds of innocent prisoners.

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.