New plan may lessen number of incarcerated drug offenders

For a long time many people in Minneapolis-St. Paul who were arrested and charged with federal drug crimes feared the lengthy, draconian prison sentences that accompanied those charges. The country’s war on drugs has been severe, sending people who were never violent and had very little criminal background away for decades in prison. There has been some pushback over lengthy mandatory prison sentences, however, and now Attorney General Eric Holder, on behalf of the Obama Administration, is announcing a new plan to combat these punishments.

The plan is multi-faceted and some parts will need congressional approval, but there are certain things that can be done through the Justice Department alone.

One such change is to require federal prosecutors to charge nonviolent and low-level drug offenders in ways that will avoid the mandatory sentences. If prosecutors leave out how much of a drug is recovered on the official charging document, mandatory minimum prison sentences will not come into play.

Another step that Holder and President Obama would like to take, however, requires legislators’ approval. There may be some challenge in getting Democrats and Republicans to agree on allowing federal judges a certain degree of flexibility in sentencing, but that flexibility would go far to mitigate the number of nonviolent offenders being sentenced to long prison sentences.

Not only are politicians labeling this as a step away from unfair and destructive policies, but also as an opportunity to save the country billions of dollars on incarceration. As it is, the United States federal prison system is operating almost 40 percent above capacity.

Source: Reuters, “Holder to outline new drug offender sentencing proposal,” Gabriel Debenedetti, Aug. 12, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.