New Supreme Court ruling will influence drunk driving charges

If Minneapolis police arrest you after you are involved in a fatal accident, there is a very real possibility that you could face vehicular manslaughter or vehicular homicide charges. When faced with these kinds of charges, it is important to remember that a strong criminal defense attorney can help clear your name or have your charges reduced. Trying to handle such serious charges alone is not only extremely difficult, but a mistake could cost years of your freedom.

It now may be a little harder for police to convict people of these kinds of vehicular crimes, however, following a recent Supreme Court decision. Speaking for the majority, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that law enforcement’s use of warrantless blood draws to confirm the presence of alcohol in a defendant’s system is a violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. In the future, there must be some sort of exigent circumstance for officers to proceed without a warrant.

How this is expected to affect Minneapolis-St. Paul law enforcement, however, remains to be seen. Until further information is given or more cases are litigated, it would appear that police officers must get a warrant without some very clear reason as to why they cannot wait to draw blood. Even then, a criminal defense lawyer will likely argue that the reason provided was not, in fact, exigent.

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers also wrote a brief in support of the majority’s position, citing the fact that 21 states already require a warrant before a blood draw. They note that there is nothing that prevents these states from processing and prosecuting drunk driving suspects.

Source: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, “Supreme Court ruling on blood draws could have big impact on drunken driving cases,” Bruce Vielmetti, April 17, 2013

Being charged with something like vehicular manslaughter or homicide is extremely serious. Find out more about how we have helped defendants deal with these criminal charges by visiting our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.