Northern Minnestoa man accused of fraud

A 46-year-old man from Duluth is facing several counts of fraud after allegedly concealing income in order to receive county benefits. He is accused of fraudulently receiving $7,873.53 in medical assistance, cash benefits and food support from the county of St. Louis. The man allegedly neglected to report that he had been receiving unemployment benefits, veterans benefits and income from employment. He is charged with theft by swindle and wrongfully obtaining assistance. A court date is set for Jan. 16.

The alleged fraud began in March of 2011. The man applied for health care, cash, food support and emergency help through the Department of Health and Human Services in St. Louis County. He claimed that he was not getting any other benefits and that he had been unemployed since July 2010.

The criminal report states that the man was actually getting unemployment benefits from Colorado. He had also been receiving veterans benefits for most of 2011. The man was apparently working at Northwoods Trucking for most of the year as well. He allegedly failed to report the $8,000 he earned at the job.

The complaint also states the man was warned several times that he must submit all sources of income to authorities. While reporting his income in May 2012, he claimed to be receiving $566 per month in veterans benefits; however, investigators learned that he had already been receiving that money for a few months. He was eventually denied county benefits for failing to accurately report his income.

The man claims that he did in fact report his earnings from the trucking job and from his unemployment benefits. White collar crimes such as these can be especially aggravating to taxpayers, as it appears that the man has illegally acquired money that is meant for people who really need emergency help. However, it must be left up to the courts to decide whether or not this man is actually guilty of the charges against him.

Source: duluthnewstribune.com, “Duluth man faces fraud charges” Tom Olsen, Dec. 18, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.