Northfield man sentenced on Lakeville gross misdemeanor DWI charge

Last summer, a Lakeville Police officer says that he drove past a Lakeville sports bar several times while on patrol. The officer says that he noticed a man sitting in a green Jeep parked in the bar’s parking lot on three separate occasions as the cop drove past the bar.

Around 11:30 that night, the officer claims that he saw a green Jeep making a slow left-hand turn at an intersection near the bar and pull up to a dead end, where the driver allegedly stopped and turned off the headlights to the Jeep. The Lakeville officer says that driver turned the headlights back on, and the officer pulled his squad behind the stopped vehicle.

The officer approached the car and apparently spoke to the driver. Law enforcement says that the driver said that he pulled over to make a phone call because he did not think that he should be driving. Ultimately, the driver, a 47-year-old Northfield resident, was arrested on suspicion of driving while impaired.

The man appeared I Dakota County District Court December 20 and pled guilty to a gross misdemeanor DWI charge. Authorities say that the man had previously been arrested for DWI in 2008. In that case, the driver reportedly entered into a plea deal and pled guilty to careless driving. That DWI incident was apparently used to enhance the current charge to a gross misdemeanor offense.

Generally, Minnesota’s DWI laws allow prosecutors to seek a third-degree, gross misdemeanor charge against a driver under a variety of circumstances. One avenue for the enhanced charge involves a prior DWI conviction, or a prior impaired driving related loss of license event.

In the recent Lakeville case, the Northfield man pled guilty to a gross misdemeanor DWI charge in December. The judge sentenced the man to one year in the county jail. That sentenced reportedly was stayed to two years of supervised probation. The judge ordered the man two serve 10 days on electronic home monitoring. He will be required to serve 240 hours of community service, pay fees and fines and comply with the terms of probation under the DWI sentence.

Source: Lakeville Patch, “UPDATE: Lakeville North Athletic Director Pleads Guilty to DWI,” Betsy Sundquist, Jan. 3, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.