Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

One Minnesota felony DWI appeal is unsuccessful

No matter the case, there is generally hope when it comes to a DUI defense. Even if the suspect is a supposed repeat offender, he deserves a vigilant defense against the limitations that a drunk driving conviction can place on his life.

One Minnesota man recently exercised his persistence in defending his name by appealing a DWI conviction – his 12th conviction. According to reports, however, persistence didn’t pay off this time around. The man remains to be found guilty of drunk driving and driving with a revoked license.

The charges against the Minnesota man stem from a late-night incident during which an officer claims he caught the appellant sitting behind the wheel of a vehicle with its lights on in a parking lot. The officer claims there was sufficient reason to put the suspect through sobriety tests, which he reportedly failed. He was charged with and later convicted of two felony DWI counts. He also had a revoked license at the time and was, therefore, convicted of driving after cancellation (DAC.)

His appeal was based on the argument that the prosecution had misled the jury in regards to reasonable doubt. He and his defense attorney also argued that the officer couldn’t prove that the appellant had operated the motor vehicle on the night he was arrested.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court and affirmed its convictions against the appellant. The court believes that the jury understood the general idea of reasonable doubt in regards to its verdict and that the prosecution didn’t taint the outcome of the case.

As for whether it could be proven that the appellant was drinking and driving on the night of the arrest, the court ruled that the following points supported the guilty verdict: the appellant was behind the wheel of the car; the key was reportedly in the ignition; the headlights were on; he reportedly didn’t tell the officer during the time of the arrest that he hadn’t been driving.

With the guilty convictions intact, the Minnesota man will serve his sentence of 79 months in prison, including 365 days for the DAC conviction.

Source

Leagle: “State v. Butcher,” Aug. 15, 2011

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.