Panel plans to change the Minnesota Sex Offender Program

It was after a class action lawsuit filed by inmates of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program argued that their indefinite civil commitment was a violation of their constitutional rights that a federal judge ordered the state to change the program. It was after a foreign court refused to extradite a man accused of a sex crime to Minnesota, however, that it truly became obvious how horrible the Minnesota civil commitment program truly is. Calling it a “flagrant denial” of the suspect’s human rights, the court would not send the man to Minnesota even though there was only a chance that he would be civilly committed.

Unfortunately for Minnesotans, our sex offender program is one of the largest in the nation; Minnesota commits more individuals per capita than any other state. There are currently more than 600 people enrolled in the program. Recognizing the need for a change, a panel of 15 judges, mental health professionals, individuals within the sexual rehabilitation field and public safety officials have been tasked with reforming the program.

By Dec. 3, they will need to have recommendations on how to create an alternative to the secure treatment facilities that are currently being used.

The task is certainly not easy. Though many people may recognize that the Minnesota Sex Offender Program needs to change, some people in the community are likely concerned about releasing former sex offenders into the community, even if they have been classified as nonviolent offenders by prison officials. In addition, as options like halfway houses emerge, the panel will have to deal with individuals concerned that these facilities will be in their neighborhoods.

This blog has previously talked about how serious sex crimes can be in Minnesota, especially for those previous offenders who must register on the sex offender registry. This story shows that, for some, one mistake could also lead to a lifetime of civil confinement.

Source: Star Tribune, “Sex offender panel is clear on gravity of its assignment,” Gail Rosenblum, Oct. 13, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.