Plea deal reached for Minneapolis officer involved in sex crimes

When one thinks of a Minneapolis officer involved in a sex crime, one thinks of the officer as part of the prosecution’s team, building a case against an alleged offender. In this case, a former Minneapolis park police officer was the defendant.

The Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board describes the Minneapolis Park Police Department as law enforcement limited to within the city’s public parks. According to a news report, a retired Minneapolis park police officer was charged with first degree criminal sexual conduct and 15 counts of possession of child pornography.

The alleged victim of sexual molestation was 15 at the time of the initial criminal charges, and the sexual contact reportedly had taken place over a three-year period of time. Apparently, the prosecution reached out in search of other sexual molestation victims and more than two dozen additional potential victims were identified.

The potential punishment for one count of first degree sexual assault is a maximum of 30 years in jail. The news story did not mention any prior record, but clearly the former park police officer was facing significant time behind bars if convicted of the charges.

This week, just before a trial was about to begin, the defendant in this case plead guilty to one count of criminal sexual contact and three counts of possession of child pornography. The defense and the prosecution agreed on a sentence length of between 12 and 18 years in prison. Because a plea deal was reached, the alleged victim, now 17-years-old, will not be forced to testify.

When someone is accused of multiple crimes and more than one charge, the defendant can choose to minimize the negative consequences by pleading guilty to lesser charges. The discussions between the defendant and his attorney are, of course, confidential so we will not know what led him to his decision. Sentencing is next week.

Source: KARE-11, “Former Minneapolis officer pleads guilty to lesser sex crime charges,” March 9, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.