Plea deal reached for Minneapolis officer involved in sex crimes

When one thinks of a Minneapolis officer involved in a sex crime, one thinks of the officer as part of the prosecution’s team, building a case against an alleged offender. In this case, a former Minneapolis park police officer was the defendant.

The Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board describes the Minneapolis Park Police Department as law enforcement limited to within the city’s public parks. According to a news report, a retired Minneapolis park police officer was charged with first degree criminal sexual conduct and 15 counts of possession of child pornography.

The alleged victim of sexual molestation was 15 at the time of the initial criminal charges, and the sexual contact reportedly had taken place over a three-year period of time. Apparently, the prosecution reached out in search of other sexual molestation victims and more than two dozen additional potential victims were identified.

The potential punishment for one count of first degree sexual assault is a maximum of 30 years in jail. The news story did not mention any prior record, but clearly the former park police officer was facing significant time behind bars if convicted of the charges.

This week, just before a trial was about to begin, the defendant in this case plead guilty to one count of criminal sexual contact and three counts of possession of child pornography. The defense and the prosecution agreed on a sentence length of between 12 and 18 years in prison. Because a plea deal was reached, the alleged victim, now 17-years-old, will not be forced to testify.

When someone is accused of multiple crimes and more than one charge, the defendant can choose to minimize the negative consequences by pleading guilty to lesser charges. The discussions between the defendant and his attorney are, of course, confidential so we will not know what led him to his decision. Sentencing is next week.

Source: KARE-11, “Former Minneapolis officer pleads guilty to lesser sex crime charges,” March 9, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.