Police use Facebook Videos to Link Teens to Crime

If a Minneapolis resident heard that police had used videos to link a teenager to a crime, he or she would likely think that there was some kind of surveillance video that clearly depicted a child committing a crime. What is far more tenuous to accept, however, is that police would use video shot by suspects as evidence that they were involved in a crime. Since when did it become a crime to tape something going on?

After someone saw a video that had been posted on Facebook of a 16-year-old punching a man in the face, police started to look for who recorded the cellphone video. They eventually came across a 17-year-old and an 18-year-old. Instead of questioning them about the incident, how they came across it and if they knew any of the individuals they had recorded, the police arrested them and prosecutors subsequently charged them with first-degree murder.

Though reports do not indicate that the men were actually involved in the assault or that they even came into contact with the man, they have been charged in his death. In order to file such serious charges, prosecutors must have some kind of concrete evidence that links these teens to the crime, but it is unknown if they currently have any such evidence. Without it, it is possible that the charges will have to be dropped or that they will be acquitted.

It can be extremely reckless for police and prosecutors to level such harsh charges against teenagers that, from all appearances, were just taping an assault. These kinds of charges can have extremely serious consequences and it is important that only those who have actually been breaking the law be charged.

Source: Chicago Tribune, “Cops: 2 more charged in deadly attack posted on Facebook,” Jim Jaworski and Bridget Doyle, July 16, 2012

To learn more about how to defend a murder charge in Minnesota, visit our violent felony defense page.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.