Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Richfield man accused of felony CVO in Bloomington

The Minnesota State Patrol says that troopers responded to a rollover car accident at the Interstate 494 and I-35W interchange Saturday night. It is not clear from media reports what occurred to cause the rollover, nor are there any details about the potential accident victims. While troopers were on the scene of the crash, authorities claim that a 39-year-old Richfield man sideswiped one squad car before crashing into the rear-end of a second squad.

A trooper in the second squad suffered injuries, according to the state patrol. That trooper was later treated and released from an area hospital. However, authorities say that the man who is accused of failing to properly navigate around an accident scene was impaired when he drove through the accident scene. Authorities say that a 20-year-old passenger and two children were riding as passengers in the Richfield man’s car. Nobody was seriously injured.

Troopers claim that the Richfield man appeared unsteady on his feet after the accident, and allegedly showed signs of impairment. Officials have not released many other details about Saturday’s alleged incident in Bloomington, other than the law enforcement believes the driver was over the legal limit to drive.

The Richfield man was arrested on suspicion of felony criminal vehicular operation.

Generally, criminal vehicular operation charges are not technically placed within the driving while impaired statute. But a CVH or CVO conviction involving alcohol or other substances can be used to enhance future DWI charges to the felony level.

A person does not necessarily have to be impaired to face a criminal vehicular homicide or injury charge. The CVH and CVO law allows prosecutors to seek the charges based upon allegations that a driver caused an accident involving injury or death based upon either gross negligence in driving, or negligence in driving while under the influence of alcohol, drugs or other specified substances.

Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune, “Man who hit state trooper’s squad remains in jail,” David Chanen, Jan. 27, 2013

  • Our firm represents individuals charged with DWI in Minnesota, including alcohol or substance related CVH and CVO charges. For more information, please visit the Minneapolis felony DWI defense page.
Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.