Rising Blood Alcohol Levels Used as Potential DWI Defense

Rising blood alcohol levels can potentially be used as a defense against a DWI. A person may not have been drunk when they were initially driving, but increasing blood alcohol concentration (BAC) could put him or her over the legal limit as time passes. Successfully using rising BAC as a defense can be tricky, and certain conditions should apply. An experienced St. Paul DWI attorney can answer questions about this type of case.

Minnesota Laws Against DWI

Thousands of people in Minnesota are arrested each year for DWI. Each case may be a little different, depending on the arrest, previous violations, and criminal record. Violators of the law face a myriad of criminal and administrative sanctions.

For the first offense, drivers can expect at least 90 days in jail, depending on the BAC level. Administrative penalties include 90 days of no driving, which is reduced to 30 days with a guilty plea. A level higher than 0.16 warrants one year in jail and either one year of no driving or one year of driving with an ignition interlock. An ignition interlock requires the driver to breathe into the device before the car starts.

Second and third offenses include more jail time and loss of driving privileges. After four offenses in a ten-year period, the charge will be a felony with seven years in prison and/or a $14,000 fine.

What Does Rising BAC Mean?

Social drinkers and moderate drinkers can learn to estimate their BAC, and they know their personal limits for driving. However, rising BAC levels can cause drivers who were not drunk initially to be over the legal limits as time passes.

When alcohol is consumed, it is absorbed into the bloodstream gradually, via the stomach and small intestine. The liver will then filter the blood, and the alcohol will eventually break down. Once a person has stopped drinking, his or her blood alcohol levels continue to climb because absorption is gradual. Eating can slow the breakdown of alcohol, also leading to slowly rising BAC levels.

For rising BAC to be used successfully, a few conditions should be met.

  • Near the legal limit
  • A time delay before testing
  • No clear signs of intoxication

A rising DWI defense can help prevent a conviction. DWI penalties are severe, and anyone who could benefit from this defense should consider legal assistance.

Citation

https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/ots/educational-materials/Documents/impaired-dwi-consequences.pdf

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.