Robbery mistrial after jury member talks with father

The cornerstone of the criminal justice system is a fair trial. Everyone in Minnesota who is facing criminal charges should only be convicted on evidence presented at trial, not because the charges are disturbing or because a member of the jury has a “feeling” about the defendant. There are numerous rules and regulations about how members of the jury and other parties must act while a case is going on, and if someone doesn’t follow those rules, there is a risk that the trial will no longer be fair.

If a jury member can no longer be relied upon to make an unbiased decision, the case should be declared a mistrial.

For a young man accused of robbing a restaurant last year, the judge presiding over his trial declared a mistrial after the father of the employee who was working during the robbery admitted to giving a member of the jury a ride home. The father insists that they did not talk about the trial during the ride, but this clearly was not allowable. At risk that the jury member had been tampered with, the judge had little option but to cancel the trial and reschedule for a later date.

Although having a case declared a mistrial does not mean that the defendant is free to go, it does mean that he will have a better chance at a fair trial. Now he and his criminal defense attorney will only need to argue that prosecutors have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he robbed and shot a restaurant worker.

Source: al.com, “Victim’s father in Huntsville robbery/shooting gives juror a ride home, judge declares mistrial,” Nicole Emmett, Aug. 27, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

Is Fingerprint Evidence Reliable?

Because fingerprints are generally considered unique, prosecutors often present fingerprint evidence as strong proof in criminal cases. However, fingerprint analysis is not always as straightforward as television crime shows make it appear. Fingerprint evidence is a type of forensic evidence used to connect a person to a crime scene, object, or location. Investigators collect fingerprints from surfaces such as weapons, vehicles, windows, phones, or packaging materials and compare them to known prints associated with a suspect.

What Is Soliciting Prostitution?

Prostitution solicitation is sometimes a felony-level offense. An example is when a defendant is accused of solicitation of a minor – a person below 18 years of age. The severity of the penalties increases as the age of the solicited child reduces.