Senators Want DUI Applications Removed From Smartphones

In March, four Democratic U.S. Senators, Harry Reid, D-Utah, Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and Tom Udall, D-N.M., drafted a letter requesting that Apple, Google and Research in Motion (or RIM) eliminate the applications (user-friendly computer programs for specific tasks) on mobile communication devices that warn drivers of the locations of drunk-driving checkpoints.

The next day, RIM, the manufacturer of the BlackBerry agreed to the removal of driving-under-the-influence (DUI/DWI) checkpoint functionality on its BlackBerry devices.

Google later responded that it did not remove apps for any reason other than violations of the Android content policies.

Apple did not issue a public response to the request.

PhantomALERT Checkpointer Mr. DUI Buzzed Fuzz Alert

These apps, which work on smartphones and most GPS devices, provide alerts to warn drivers of impending speed traps, red-light cameras, railroad crossings and school zones.

Many of the programs use reports from other drivers to maintain the currency of the information. The DUI/DWI checkpoint warnings, however, sparked the interest of the senators who noted in their letter to the tech companies:

“We appreciate the technology that has allowed millions of Americans to have information at their fingertips, but giving drunk drivers a free tool to evade checkpoints, putting innocent families and children at risk, is a matter of public concern. We hope that you will give our request to make these applications unavailable immediate consideration.”

Are All of These Apps Bad?

The USA Today story that first brought the apps to the attention of the senators, mentions that not all law enforcement sees these warnings as a bad thing. USA Today quotes Officer Brian Walters from Virginia Beach, Va., who is responsible for the city’s red-light camera program, felt the applications might be helpful: “I’m all for them,” he says.

“A couple of GPS companies have sent me requests to verify and validate where our cameras are. I helped them.” He says the devices and apps make drivers more aware while driving. “If that’s what gets them to comply, that’s fine,” he says.

The story also quotes a driver who thinks using his GPS with the PhantomAlert app makes him a better driver because the alerts force him to pay better attention to his driving and his surroundings.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.