Sex crime allegations dropped, others raised against Elmo puppeteer

Far too often, people who make sex crime allegations have ulterior motives. Such motives include everything from a desire for publicity or notoriety to seeking advantage in a child custody dispute or even vengeance.

Although some of these motives may be hard to believe, when there is no evidence other than the accuser’s word, accusations of sex crimes often need to be taken with a grain of salt. This is especially true when the events happened a long time ago, because people’s memories do change. Often, a criminal defense attorney is the only person willing to be skeptical about such claims, though, because they are so serious and, if true, often heartbreaking.

Recently Kevin Clash, the man behind the voice of Sesame Street’s Elmo was accused of statutory rape. Clash, a divorced 52-year-old father who is gay, admits he was involved at one time in a consensual sexual relationship with the man who accused him of the sex crime. His accuser claimed that Clash had sex with him when he was 16 — under the legal age of consent.

Only a week later, Kevin Clash’s accuser has recanted his story in exchange for a $125,000 settlement. Most recently, however, the man has once again changed his story, which leaves his integrity in doubt.

Questions do have to be asked. If these allegations are true, why did it take the now 24-year-old man eight years to come forward? If he was seeking justice, why would he change his story in exchange for a monetary settlement? If he was seeking compensation, why didn’t he handle it privately? Which of the two men is more credible?

Meanwhile, Clash was on unpaid leave from his job at Sesame Street pending the investigation. Unfortunately, a new accuser has come forward with additional allegations of underage sex against the puppeteer. Clash has now resigned.

While the additional allegations may seem to imply that the original ones were true, it is very difficult to tell when dealing with a highly-publicized story about a celebrity. Just as there are copycat criminals, there are often copycat “victims” who come forward once a celebrity is accused. Part of the investigation of these further allegations will be the long process of sorting out any truth from what may be false allegations by publicity hounds or others seeking a financial benefit from making the accusations.

While sex crimes are among those our society considers the most serious, false allegations are incredibly damaging, and not only to celebrities. If you have been falsely accused of being in a non-consensual sexual relationship with another person in Minnesota, you should take immediate steps to defend your rights and your reputation.

Source: New York Post, “Elmo’ puppeteer Kevin Clash resigns as second man files lawsuit over new underage sex allegations,” Robert Gearty, Kerry Burke, Philip Caulfield and Larry Mcshane, Nov. 20, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.