Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Sex Offenders Sit in Legal Purgatory While Their Constitutional Rights Are Threatened

Sex offenders in Florida who have completed their prison terms often find themselves stuck in a legal limbo as they wait for the court system to determine whether they need additional civil treatment to control their culpable behavior. Court officials and civil rights advocates not only believe that individuals who have served their time for a sex crime may end up serving time beyond what was sentenced, their constitutional rights are also being threatened by the process.

After a sex offender in Florida completes their prison sentence, they must go through a court administered process that determines whether or not they are able to control the criminal behavior for which they were sentenced. If a judge decides that a former offender is a danger to society, the individual will be ordered to stay at the Florida Civil Commitment Center. The law says that upon the completion of an offender’s prison term a judge has 30 days to decide whether the former offender is a danger to society. More often than not, the length of the commitment determination process goes beyond the allotted 30 days and can take years in some instances.

During the determination process former offenders are held as pre-trial detainees, and they are neither released nor given mental health counseling or treatment. Former offenders have the opportunity to challenge their civil commitment, but there is an inherent contradiction within the challenge proceeding. A judge may find that a former offender is a danger to society as a violent predator. If so, the former offender is given a defense attorney and is sent to the treatment center to wait for the trial date.

Fruitful mental health treatment requires that former offenders reveal past acts that they may not have been convicted for, and a person challenging their commitment would not want to reveal any incriminating acts from the past. Civil rights advocates say the process presents the problem of punishing former offenders twice for the same sex crime.

Source: Herald Tribune, “Is Florida Holding Sex Offenders in Legal Limbo?” Todd Ruger, 12/13/10

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.