Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Sex Offenders Sit in Legal Purgatory While Their Constitutional Rights Are Threatened

Sex offenders in Florida who have completed their prison terms often find themselves stuck in a legal limbo as they wait for the court system to determine whether they need additional civil treatment to control their culpable behavior. Court officials and civil rights advocates not only believe that individuals who have served their time for a sex crime may end up serving time beyond what was sentenced, their constitutional rights are also being threatened by the process.

After a sex offender in Florida completes their prison sentence, they must go through a court administered process that determines whether or not they are able to control the criminal behavior for which they were sentenced. If a judge decides that a former offender is a danger to society, the individual will be ordered to stay at the Florida Civil Commitment Center. The law says that upon the completion of an offender’s prison term a judge has 30 days to decide whether the former offender is a danger to society. More often than not, the length of the commitment determination process goes beyond the allotted 30 days and can take years in some instances.

During the determination process former offenders are held as pre-trial detainees, and they are neither released nor given mental health counseling or treatment. Former offenders have the opportunity to challenge their civil commitment, but there is an inherent contradiction within the challenge proceeding. A judge may find that a former offender is a danger to society as a violent predator. If so, the former offender is given a defense attorney and is sent to the treatment center to wait for the trial date.

Fruitful mental health treatment requires that former offenders reveal past acts that they may not have been convicted for, and a person challenging their commitment would not want to reveal any incriminating acts from the past. Civil rights advocates say the process presents the problem of punishing former offenders twice for the same sex crime.

Source: Herald Tribune, “Is Florida Holding Sex Offenders in Legal Limbo?” Todd Ruger, 12/13/10

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.